Lol check out the bottom of this article

[Aleksandr]

Should I Be Losing My Hair at the Age of 25?


"We don't just do hair loss treatments, we also do treatments for erectile dysfunction"

... talk about a convenient business model

 

[MNK99]

check out these trichology douchebags:

Just cuz he has a faux european accent, doesn't make him some genius in the science behind sensation and perception, i.e. what he refers to as psychological -- placebo effect, associating preexisting conditions with the stoppage of a pill (the only thing stopped). Let alone random unforeseen reactions to "medications" / castration devices (it was impossible!! to them). I hope whoever released this drug is fed to a monster crocodile. Including those FDA cucks that passed it. And the people who teach med students, it's all safe/ patient's always wrong. LOL, I haven't been wrong in 20yrs, in debating those idiots.

less dishonest guy:

Look up world hair congress, you'll see 20 garbage companies with zero science and zero business sense (on the business side), shilling companies that definitely will fail (100% of the time). (outside of ones sponsered by say Shishedo. but also they won't be useful). Hence, all those kids buying strange anti androgens.

I hope some of them go public, just to short them 1-2 yrs after their IPO. I mean histogen, replicel, etc...

 

[Trump_1776]

check out these trichology douchebags:

Just cuz he has a faux european accent, doesn't make him some genius in the science behind sensation and perception, i.e. what he refers to as psychological -- placebo effect, associating preexisting conditions with the stoppage of a pill (the only thing stopped). Let alone random unforeseen reactions to "medications" / castration devices (it was impossible!! to them). I hope whoever released this drug is fed to a monster crocodile. Including those FDA cucks that passed it. And the people who teach med students, it's all safe/ patient's always wrong. LOL, I haven't been wrong in 20yrs, in debating those idiots.

less dishonest guy:

Look up world hair congress, you'll see 20 garbage companies with zero science and zero business sense (on the business side), shilling companies that definitely will fail (100% of the time). (outside of ones sponsered by say Shishedo. but also they won't be useful). Hence, all those kids buying strange anti androgens.

I hope some of them go public, just to short them 1-2 yrs after their IPO. I mean histogen, replicel, etc...

That time when Hellouser on HLT took everyone's money to go to the hair congress in Japan and then straight disappeared

 

[MNK99]

Haha.

He's from Toronto.

I mean I stopped going on there (only went on bc of OCD /anxiety, and also dex... once you start something can't stop basically + I'm like that anyways).
However, I just assumed... he was either waiting on regrowing hair... or sad or whatever. I didn't know he literally vanished lol. That's fucked up man. That's a douche move.
I think he made some appearances later to show how he used Ru55841 or whatever it is, months later.

Unless you mean he unbecomingly came into some trouble. I don't wish his random disappearance. I don't know him that well.

 

[RebelWithACause]

I think it is clear being sick is very good for people who want to earn money from you.

I don't think it started this way. It started as a natural thing: people dealt with illnesses and you paid to get help and get better. This is the basic thought behind capitalism and a healthy society.

I don't mind paying people who help me. For example the hairtests or if Hackstasis needs money for something I am happy to donate. Or a guy like Helen. There is nothing wrong with paying for things that help you.

But the longer this system goes on the more perverse it becomes.

You are paying people who keep you sick. The irony.

People/companies make you sick so they can earn money from you. And then they keep you sick so they can keep earning money from you.

Instead of being a tool to help you get better - they have become weapons against you. Traps where they can catch their prey (the sick) so they can extort their money.

It is the world upside down. It is evil (opposite is live). It is against life. Evil is not "evil" in the sense that you go to hell (although maybe you will). It just means anti-life. Same for abortion, frankenfoods, etc. It is all evil. I got this idea from Victor Pride. And he is right. Check out his podcast "Bold & Determined".

 

[ruprmurdoch]

Install feminism culture-------> Persuade women that working like male is good--------> Feed you child with you breast shorter than 1 year, beacuse you have to earn money and have to be independent------------>Your baby will have problem with weak hairs/balding during late 20's, beacuse of poor cranial development----------->Find out finasteride .
They will go to hell.

 

[Trump_1776]

Install feminism culture-------> Persuade women that working like male is good--------> Feed you child with you breast shorter than 1 year, beacuse you have to earn money and have to be independent------------>Your baby will have problem with weak hairs/balding during late 20's, beacuse of poor cranial development----------->Find out finasteride .
They will go to hell.

Feminism is an absolute cancer.

 

[raven]

Install feminism culture-------> Persuade women that working like male is good--------> Feed you child with you breast shorter than 1 year, beacuse you have to earn money and have to be independent------------>Your baby will have problem with weak hairs/balding during late 20's, beacuse of poor cranial development----------->Find out finasteride .
They will go to hell.

To place feminist culture as the first cause here is just wrong. You think that women would be working like they are if it was still possible to live a comfortable, standard, family life on one income?

It's a religious post-war free market capitalism that has warped the incentives here. We've been driven towards a consumerist culture with hyper individualistic values where our lifestyles can only be maintained by working long hours. In Western Europe the only pushback to this has come from left wing social policy e.g. childcare and paternity/maternity leave.

 

[Trump_1776]

To place feminist culture as the first cause here is just wrong. You think that women would be working like they are if it was still possible to live a comfortable, standard, family life on one income?

It's a religious post-war free market capitalism that has warped the incentives here. We've been driven towards a consumerist culture with hyper individualistic values where our lifestyles can only be maintained by working long hours. In Western Europe the only pushback to this has come from left wing social policy e.g. childcare and paternity/maternity leave.

Capitalist pigs! -Shouts the guy on his smartphone accessing the internet via satellite

 

[raven]

Capitalist pigs! -Shouts the guy on his smartphone accessing the internet via satellite

1. Who says I'm immune to the incentives? If it was easy for human beings to reject the ideals of the society they live in there would be no issue here, because we could just generate an effective bottom up movement and change the culture.

2. The vast majority of Western scientific and technological advancement was state funded, being anti-capitalist doesn't mean one is anti-technology or anti all consumption.

 

[RebelWithACause]

To place feminist culture as the first cause here is just wrong. You think that women would be working like they are if it was still possible to live a comfortable, standard, family life on one income?

It's a religious post-war free market capitalism that has warped the incentives here. We've been driven towards a consumerist culture with hyper individualistic values where our lifestyles can only be maintained by working long hours. In Western Europe the only pushback to this has come from left wing social policy e.g. childcare and paternity/maternity leave.

Dude it is not hard to live from 1 income. Even now. Kids are not that expensive. People just are deluded what they need. Companies want you to believe you need a lot of shit so you buy it.

Women don't need to work. They wanted to work because they want to have the same "privileges" (what privilige? to be a slave?) This is a lie. Women are empowered in the home where they take care of their kids who love her. Women are not empowered in the work field where they are under stress.

Women are made for the family life. That is where they are happy. A lot of women are absolutely miserable. I see it around me everyday. They have no purpose because the purpose of women is to bear children and create a big family.

Men can handle this type of stuff. Men are more rational so they can oversee things.

Women want to act like masculine men. But instead act like feminine bitchy men with all the negative traits.

Women cannot handle that much stress. I notice on my job all women come to me when they cannot handle the stress.

Yes there are bulldykes who are closer to men. Those women can do fine. But they are the exception, not the rule.

 

[RebelWithACause]

1. Who says I'm immune to the incentives? If it was easy for human beings to reject the ideals of the society they live in there would be no issue here, because we could just generate an effective bottom up movement and change the culture.

2. The vast majority of Western scientific and technological advancement was state funded, being anti-capitalist doesn't mean one is anti-technology or anti all consumption.

I do think you have a point with the consumerism. Capitalism can turn into a perversion as well. Just like any other system. This is why you need these cycles. Sometimes the old version needs to be destroyed to make place for a new better version. Or just a plain reset.

 

[raven]

Dude it is not hard to live from 1 income. Even now. Kids are not that expensive. People just are deluded what they need. Companies want you to believe you need a lot of shit so you buy it.

Women don't need to work. They wanted to work because they want to have the same "privileges" (what privilige? to be a slave?) This is a lie. Women are empowered in the home where they take care of their kids who love her. Women are not empowered in the work field where they are under stress.

Women are made for the family life. That is where they are happy. A lot of women are absolutely miserable. I see it around me everyday. They have no purpose because the purpose of women is to bear children and create a big family.

Men can handle this type of stuff. Men are more rational so they can oversee things.

They want to act like masculine men. But instead act like feminine bitchy men with all the negative traits.

Women cannot handle that much stress. I notice on my job all women come to me when they cannot handle the stress.

Yes there are bulldykes who are closer to men. Those women can do fine. But they are the exception, not the rule.

Yes we are rich enough in Western countries that the vast majority of people could have comfortable simple lives if they wanted, but human beings are easily manipulated, and due to low regulation on advertisements etc. we have become addicted to lifestyles that are more difficult to maintain. This isn't the fault of the people, the point I'm making is that corporations have been allowed to take advantage of human traits which are very natural without any oversight.

On average women and men are biologically different so they on average will have different preferences, but it's a spectrum with overlap and like you said, some women are different, I think the first waves of feminism were positive, because they gave women the right to choose, the next step is to correct the incentives, and then you'll see more women making choices that make them happy, with no loss of freedom.

 

[manu]

 

[RebelWithACause]

Hackstasis always baits me into writing these long essays about random shit.

 

[manu]

I think the first waves of feminism were positive, because they gave women the right to choose, the next step is to correct the incentives, and then you'll see more women making choices that make them happy, with no loss of freedom.

Well that's my big hope, too!

 

[raven]

TLDR about feminism and jews.

Give everybody except the strongest all the power and let them run the country.

Everybody will choose for their own agenda's. Women have their own agenda. Muslims. Transexuals. Homosexuals. Pedophiles.

Also cause confusion between the traditional roles between men and women. Make women think they are men.

And you get chaos and destabilisation.

Civilisations like this are built by masculine men. In a sense civilisation is the masculine mindset at large.

So you make sure you weaken masculine men, make them into sissyboys and give them no power. Give the rest of society power. Including women and sodomites and people who are against the society.

There is a reason why religions like Islam make sure the woman has no rights. You see what happens when you give them all the rights in the world. They destroy themselves and they destroy their country.

Women have a group instinct. They want everybody to be equal. This is not how reality works. You let in people from other countries they will conquer you.

Men of the past knew this truth. Now it is called sexist. Yea whatever. If you want to live in chaos and danger, give a woman all the power. Not my cup of tea.

It is pretty easy. It is not that genius. I don't think this small group of rich jews are that smart. They are just nasty people who ignore values (LOGOS) and play on an animalistic level. They have a book which tells them that talking to a non-Jew is like taking to a dog. This is how they see Westerners, like scum.

In the end this is human nature and it is part of life.

Civilisation has been built by all types of people, Michelangelo and Da Vinci were gay, a lot of the great scientists have been introverted, a lot of the great poets were hyper emotional.

The old world where you had nations vying against each other for power analogous to hunter gatherer tribes died with WW2 and the invention of nukes, and other technologies that will ensure that we become ever more connected to each other.

In the future if we are to build societies that allow human beings to have fulfilling lives they will necessarily require the influence of both traditionally masculine values like strength and traditionally feminine values like empathy.

 

[raven]

Hackstasis always baits me into writing these long essays about random shit.

lol it has been a while since I had pointless Internet discussions, that's why I was sad when you deleted your other essays

 

[RebelWithACause]

Civilisation has been built by all types of people, Michelangelo and Da Vinci were gay, a lot of the great scientists have been introverted, a lot of the great poets were hyper emotional.

The old world where you had nations vying against each other for power analogous to hunter gatherer tribes died with WW2 and the invention of nukes, and other technologies that will ensure that we become ever more connected to each other.

In the future if we are to build societies that allow human beings to have fulfilling lives they will necessarily require the influence of both traditionally masculine values like strength and traditionally feminine values like empathy.

The protection that masculine men offer (e.g. strong borders, good family values) allows creativity to blossom. Without that protection creativity goes down and people become more animalistic. Because people will be under threat everyday - they cannot think about inventions or luxuries like creativity for the sake of art. Masculinity comes first, without it your society will go down.

I agree you need both. Women are there to create families and communities and keep them together. It is Yin & Yang. Without Yang (masculinity) you cannot have Yin.

When I was in Japan I talked to Europeans and Africans who lived there and Japanese people are racist as fuck. They don't care. You are living in their country so it is their rules. A lot of people from outside Japan who live there they whine about this and don't understand it. They are all people from the West. I wonder why.

You are dealing with a lot of people who have no sense of logos. Who act like animals and want to take and conquer everywhere they go. You need masculine men to protect you from these forces. You need masculine men to protect the perimeter and protect the values of society. Without that protection your society does not exist.

Of course we have policemen, an army, etc. But you are importing other cultures and place them within this culture. Which acts like a trojan horse. When there is enough other cultures they will vote for their own and you will get less and less rights. It does not even have to be with violence.

I think it is going on everywhere. Even in Eastern European it is slowly becoming like this. Even in Japan you see they want to import muslims. It is global. But the West is on the front of the train. Right now the target is Europeans. Before this it was blacks. Next are, I don't know. We will see.

I don't hate any culture or any race or any religion but there are realities in this world that you need to understand. I don't care what other cultures do, I am not part of it. If you want your culture to stay alive you need to sometimes be strict and push out cultures that are not good for your society. You need to be "racist" - OH NO!

I think if you are from another culture but you adapt to the culture that is fine. But I think too much of these people is not good. It needs to be under control.

I think this happened always. When times are easy people let their guard down and other (hungry) cultures will come and take your stuff. This is a cycle.

Articles:

Schools in France to replace 'mother and father' with 'parent 1 and 2' under controversial same sex amendment

'Most convicted rapists in Sweden foreign'

Western Society Is Being Completely Inverted

The Inversion Agenda

Tokyo cops arrest 2 Turks seeking refugee status in gang rape of woman

Schools to begin educating five-year-olds on same-sex relationships

The latest LGBT lunacy: ‘Transgender’ puppet to teach kids about ‘gender issues’

Transgender women in sport: Are they really a 'threat' to female sport?

Women’s Sports and Transgender Athletes: Unfair Competition | National Review

Drag queen storytime reader once charged with child sex assault

Transphobia’s New Target Is the World of Sports

Porn the new weapon of choice Why is porn free? And who owns these companies?

 

[raven]

The protection that masculine men offer (e.g. strong borders, good family values) allows creativity to blossom. Without that protection creativity goes down and people become more animalistic. Because people will be under threat everyday - they cannot think about inventions or luxuries like creativity for the sake of art. Masculinity comes first, without it your society will go down.

I agree you need both. Women are there to create families and communities and keep them together. It is Yin & Yang. Without Yang (masculinity) you cannot have Yin.

When I was in Japan I talked to Europeans and Africans who lived there and Japanese people are racist as fuck. They don't care. You are living in their country so it is their rules. A lot of people from outside Japan who live there they whine about this and don't understand it. They are all people from the West. I wonder why.

You are dealing with a lot of people who have no sense of logos. Who act like animals and want to take and conquer everywhere they go. You need masculine men to protect you from these forces. You need masculine men to protect the perimeter and protect the values of society. Without that protection your society does not exist.

Of course we have policemen, an army, etc. But you are importing other cultures and place them within this culture. Which acts like a trojan horse. When there is enough other cultures they will vote for their own and you will get less and less rights. It does not even have to be with violence.

I think it is going on everywhere. Even in Eastern European it is slowly becoming like this. Even in Japan you see they want to import muslims. It is global. But the West is on the front of the train. Right now the target is Europeans. Before this it was blacks. Next are, I don't know. We will see.

I don't hate any culture or any race or any religion but there are realities in this world that you need to understand. I don't care what other cultures do, I am not part of it. If you want your culture to stay alive you need to sometimes be strict and push out cultures that are not good for your society. You need to be "racist" - OH NO!

I think if you are from another culture but you adapt to the culture that is fine. But I think too much of these people is not good. It needs to be under control.

I think this happened always. When times are easy people let their guard down and other (hungry) cultures will come and take your stuff. This is a cycle.

Articles:

Schools in France to replace 'mother and father' with 'parent 1 and 2' under controversial same sex amendment

'Most convicted rapists in Sweden foreign'

Western Society Is Being Completely Inverted

The Inversion Agenda

Tokyo cops arrest 2 Turks seeking refugee status in gang rape of woman

Schools to begin educating five-year-olds on same-sex relationships

The latest LGBT lunacy: ‘Transgender’ puppet to teach kids about ‘gender issues’

Transgender women in sport: Are they really a 'threat' to female sport?

Women’s Sports and Transgender Athletes: Unfair Competition | National Review

Drag queen storytime reader once charged with child sex assault

Transphobia’s New Target Is the World of Sports

Porn the new weapon of choice Why is porn free? And who owns these companies?

Japanese people are racist as fuck yes, but it is changing rapidly, especially if you talk to young Japanese, ageing population and the realities of the current economic system have resulted in Japan becoming much more open to Chinese immigrants in recent years.

This is the global pattern, it's not a result of anyone being targeted. Fertility rates everywhere are dropping fast and we have an economic system which requires ever increasing growth, it isn't sustainable in the long run and in that sense, I agree. I also agree that problems occur when you take in a large number of extremely conservative religious fundamentalists, and that it is important to protect the parts of culture that we value.

But it is also important to recognise how fast we are internationalising, and that there is no turning back the clock, advances in technology will continue to connect us, continue to make the consequences of real ideological difference more catastrophic. All the big issues of our time now take place on the global stage, and only have global solutions. We either futilely try to return to how things they were, or we start fostering humanist ideals while looking for global solutions that will make the future better for everyone.

As for all your LGBT stuff, I think there are obviously extreme elements within the movement, trying to police words etc, which is not good. But overall, and this will probably be unpopular here, I don't see any issue with it. The Greeks, Romans, Renaissance Italians all had open attitudes towards homosexuality, probably the most fruitful European civilisations. Zeus used to fuck men. Being open to people who live different experiences is a good thing.
I have way more respect for the transgender person who leaves the house knowing that they're going to face abuse at some point than I do for the SJWs and Anti SJWs who spend time whinging about transgender people at a distance.